Screenwriting isn't usually the first
profession you might think of when deciding to become a writer. We
all want to write the books we love to read, but the link from writer
to film isn't always obvious; often directors, producers and actors
spring to mind. Of course, screenwriters are just as credit-worthy
and screenwriting can be a very exciting way to realise your story
ideas.
There's a lot of merit in learning
both crafts and indulging in both disciplines. Whilst the two
approaches are very different, they do share similarities; not least
the aim of telling a good story well. We all know that novels are
ripe for adaptation, too, so knowing about screenwriting could help
you approach your novel in a way that makes it attractive for this
market.
Some of the skills needed crossover,
such as the need to have interesting and enigmatic characters, the
need to set scenes well and the need to write good dialogue. Plot may be approached in the same basic pattern. The three act structure may
also come into the equation, and non-linear approaches and flashbacks
may need the same attention given to them in either discipline.
But there are differences, too. In
screenwriting, there's a distinct need for brevity; colourful yet
concise descriptions which aren't long-winded and don't state the
obvious, but which keep the reader interested and which help set the
tone and pace. Descriptions and dialogue need to avoid being
expositional (on-the-nose) and structure can play an even more
important part in setting the pace and in the story's dramatic
development.
As a published prose writer of short
stories (still attempting the novel) and a produced screenwriter, I
can vouch for the fact that, on the one hand, it can be difficult to
not slip into the opposite style of approach when tackling one of
the disciplines. I've written short stories that develop akin to that
of scenes in a script, flitting from one location to another, and
I've no doubt slipped into a more “flowery” way of writing
descriptions when writing scripts.
However, far from discouraging writers
from indulging in both disciplines, I'd actively encourage it.
Understanding each approach will help you appreciate the difference
in skills required, and discipline is such an important quality in a
writer. Not only will you be able to adapt your own work from one
format to the other, you'll be able to write excellent supporting
documents (pitch documents for both scripts and prose need literary
flare that will no doubt come easy to prose writers) and a
screenwriter will no doubt be good at approaching prose in a succinct, structured way.
If
you're a prose writer interested in trying screenwriting, then
check out my new regular column in What
The Dickens? Magazine.
Read online or buy the issues as eBooks
on Amazon.
In the October issue, I give a crash-course
in screenwriting and discuss adaptation.
Michelle
Goode is a script reader, editor and writer who operates from her
little online empire: www.writesofluid.com,
where she compiles writing resources, writes her blog and offers her
services. When she's not creating fictional worlds through scripts
and prose or writing articles, she's helping strengthen the work of
others or assessing scripts for production companies, competitions
and initiatives. Follow her adventures on her Facebook writer
page,
Writesofluid
page
and on twitter: @Sofluid.
I'm so tempted to start adapting some of my screenplays into novels, especially with the enormous budgets of filmmaking and the ease of publishing e-books. May have to give it a shot...
ReplyDeleteI'd quite like to give screenwriting a try one day, so will let you know when that day comes and hopefully you can point me in the right direction!
ReplyDeleteHi Michelle, I found that when writing my book it played out like a movie in my head without me really being conscious of it. I just wrote down what I saw. I'm not sure if it's the same for everyone but for me my book started out as a film, in a way. Having said that I imagine it is perhaps easier for someone else to do the script for your own book, they would probably have a different take and varying perspectives to me?
ReplyDelete:-)